Quantcast
RSS Feeds | Advertise | Subscribe | Contact Us
Futures Magazine.

News

Web Exclusives

 What is the Dow's REAL value? 

 
Print This Article
Return To Article
Normal Text
Large Text

What is the stock market really worth?

Warren Buffett, the renowned value investor, is noted for his ability to respond to sellers of businesses “usually within five minutes” as to whether he is interested in buying that business (at a specified price, of course). He is interested if he can buy the business at a significant discount to its “true worth”. The key, of course, is determining that thing called true worth, or as some say, “intrinsic value”.

I imagine Buffett uses a simple, but extremely powerful, formula that captures the essence of value. Using this tool, anyone can make a fairly accurate estimate of the worth of the Dow Jones Industrial Index (“the Dow”), a measure of the stock market in general.

Because the Dow Index (an agglomeration of 30 stocks) has a book value, earnings and an implied dividend it can be analyzed just like any individual stock.

Equity analysis requires a study of balance sheet items and income variables and they change continually. Thus, it is useful to "normalize" these variables in order to compare performance over time on an apples-to-apples basis. The mathematics is simple and logical.

The first step is to adjust the data for inflation. This reduces the reported numbers to constants which can then be properly compared from year to year. One of the things one notices is that, as time passes, the Dow Jones Industrial Index grows in “intrinsic value” by retaining that portion of its earnings which are not paid out as dividends. Earnings are a return on shareholders’ equity, which is commonly called “book value”.

Calculating intrinsic value is simplicity itself. Multiply earnings times an appropriate multiple and you get intrinsic value. That’s it!

Well, that’s not quite it. You might be wondering what the “appropriate multiple” part is all about. To find the answer, let’s go through the valuation process step by step. The following is the essence, the very heart, of intrinsic value:

Book Value (BV) times Return on Equity (RoE) equals Earnings (EPS)

Earnings times a Multiple equals Intrinsic Value (IV)

Book Value is a balance sheet item. While it is very stable and tends to grow steadily over time with retained earnings, it can shrink with operating losses or write-offs. It is a solid base on which to anchor the ensuing calculations.

Return on Equity is the annual earnings generated by BV. ROE will fluctuate from year to year, so it is necessary to stabilize or “normalize” it by using a long term average figure - for example, the past 10 years. In this way it is possible to reasonably estimate returns on invested capital over a long time period. If there are write-offs to BV, it means that earnings in prior years were overstated and they have to be adjusted downwards. The effect is that the previously estimated forward ROE must be lowered accordingly.

The calculated Earnings will actually be the long term “average” earnings level. For the Dow Index this is equivalent to the “coupon”, or interest rate, of a bond.

Because stock and bond investments compete for investor funds head to head in the marketplace, the equity Multiple (often referred to as the price to earnings multiple, or p/e ratio) is, generally speaking, a function of interest rates - long term corporate interest rates to be precise. The Multiple is simply the inverse the AAA corporate long bond yield. For example, if the long bond yield is 7%, then the appropriate multiple should be 100 divided by 7, or about 14.3 times. This Multiple can then be applied to the Dow Index.

Now that we have the pieces in place we are ready to calculate the intrinsic value of the Dow Jones Industrial Index. It looks like this:

Book Value of Dow, Sept. 2008 (est.) is 3298

(times) Normalized Return on Equity: 14.0%

(equals) Normalized Earnings: 462

(times) Multiple (100/7%): 14.3

(equals) Intrinsic Value: 6602

Historically, the average ROE has been approximately two times the long term corporate AAA bond yield - this is a key relationship. In the above Intrinsic Value calculation you can change the ROE and the Multiplier to suit yourself, but make sure that your numbers conform to the 2-1 ratio.

Will 14% be an average ROE in future? Is 7% a “normal” or average corporate long bond rate? Just for fun, try a 10% ROE or an 8% bond yield. In a world of 8% bond yields, the ROE should be 16% and the price/earnings multiple the inverse of the bond yield (i.e. 100 divide by 8 = 12.5). It doesn’t matter what assumption you make about either ROE or interest rates, if you apply the 2:1 ratio to its partner, the calculated intrinsic value will always be the same.

There are times when the 2:1 ratio gets seriously out of whack - in 1982 the ROE was 6.4% while the AAA corporate bond rate stood over 14%, a ratio of only .46 instead of 2. However, by 1988 things got back into line as the Dow's ROE was over 21% and the AAA corporate yield fell to below 10%.

Today the market is out of whack again - except this time recent estimates of ROE are in the 21% range and AAA corporate bonds are trading near a 7% yield.

A study of a regression of the Dow’s real prices shows a rising trend reflecting the fact that its inherent value increases over the long haul. Deviations form this trend identify, in retrospect, undervaluations such as the one that developed in the early 1980’s as well as the overvaluation bubble of the late 1990’s. While the regression line, which fluctuates as new data is incorporated, is not a proxy for intrinsic value, it does show clearly that market prices eventually revert to some long term “mean” or value.

In the long run, reversion to the mean is evident in many areas of the markets. Earnings, share prices, interest rates, currencies, commodities - they all fluctuate. As for the Dow, from this point forward, as the pendulum swings back to normal, one might reasonably expect either lower earnings or a rise in interest rates, possibly a combination of both.

From time to time wide differences between the Dow Index’s intrinsic value and its market price will develop resulting in serious misvaluations. For those wishing to own stocks, these deviations from the norm should be seen either as investment opportunities or as signals to stand aside.

So, when Warren Buffett eschews today’s equity markets as generally overpriced, I suspect he has come up with values in line with the above calculation.

John Di Tomasso is principal and head trader of Di Tomasso Group Inc., a value based commodity trading advisor.


Comment on This Article

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 10/21/2009 1:53:16 AM
    • Captain H Frith, II
    • Dividends
    • As an investment student at SJSC in the 60's we were instructed to go out and find valuable companies {I later discovered that the prof used our extensive research do a lot of day trading]. He preferred to look at "dividends' and "future estimated selling price". If he was interested in an intermediate term [1-3 years] investment he would add the dividends received and the estimated future SP then divide the result by the PP {purchase price]. If the result equaled an average of 15% AR he'd be interested. He wanted BV to show a 7 x Dividend Value, but was willing to change that to 9 or even 10 if the dividends collected provided a 1/7 of investment. For example, if he held the stock 3 years and collected $300 in dividends and expected to sell for $706 netting $306 on a $700 investment he'd consider. As long as the net result provided $306 on the $700 investment he would consider the investment returning even less upon sale or paying a greater dividend. The smaller the dividend the greater the risk of an increaded SP. A lack of of dividends required a greater increase in retained earnings to aprovide a greater multiplier.
    • 2/5/2010 1:17:53 PM
    • Danni Akers
    • Unsustainable
    • I couldn't agree more with Di Tomasso. I don't think you can find a single economic force, outside of Wall Street speculation and institutional investing, that can justify the exponential growth of pricing in the equities markets and, it follows, over-all current market valuations. These forces have brute forced the market to where it is today and the old thumb rules of prudent investing like earnings, product viability, P/E, etc. have largely been thrown out in the window in today's casino atmosphere on Wall Street. This unsustainable growth rate in equities pricing is most evident since 1980 when 401k and other institutional monies began to poor into the markets. All independent, exterior, indicators of market valuation that I have analyzed (GDP, personal income growth, CPI, PPI, valuation of the dollar, etc.) cannot justify, for example, the DOW being at it's current 10,000. Instead, all analysis I have done indicate a current DOW valuation of somewhere between 3000 and 4000. Perhaps this is the cause for the stall in markets since 2000? Irrational exuberance indeed...!

Recent Issues


Archived Issues

Most Read Articles

Related Articles