Quantcast
RSS Feeds | Advertise | Subscribe | Contact Us
Futures Magazine.

News

Web Exclusives

 Options strategy: The 1-3-2 trade 

 
Print This Article
Return To Article
Normal Text
Large Text

Question: Is there an alternative to the broken wing butterfly when it no longer can be done at a premium?
Answer: Yes. The 1-3-2 trade.

One of the strongest criticisms of butterfly spreads is that they do not metamorphose from their larva-like purchase price to their beautiful butterfly-like profitability expectancy until very close to expiration. Traders love the low risk and high potential reward of a butterfly spread, but because they have to wait until close to expiration for a decent return, the stock has ample opportunity to move away from the butterfly’s profitable zone.

Since we published the article on the broken-wing butterfly (BWB), we have received many questions about how to do one with only a few days left and how it relates to a 1-3-2 trade. We have received many excellent questions regarding the dynamics, performance, risks, and benefits of the 1-3-2 trade, and we want to share them with you here.

What is a 1-3-2? Like a broken-wing butterfly, a 1-3-2 trade will lower the cost of the spread through the purchase of a traditional butterfly spread combined with an overlapping short vertical spread. If a butterfly expires out-of-the-money (OTM) on expiration, then the total capital investment is lost. Therefore, although selling a vertical spread to pay for the butterfly has a slightly higher risk, the resultant cost reduction will hopefully outweigh it.

We can play with some IBM numbers to get an understanding of how this trade works. IBM is at $124.45 and we will assume that we are neutral to slightly bearish on the stock’s short-term direction. Looking at an option chain that has 25 days remaining (June expiration), we notice the closing prices: the 125 put, $3.88; 120 put, $2.16; 115 put, $1.26; 110 put, $0.79 and 105 put, $0.53.

We see that the traditional 125-120-115 put butterfly will cost $0.82 per share, or $82 per spread. This is a decent risk-to-reward ratio provided that the stock closes between $125 and $115. The break-even points on the spread are $124.18 (125 strike - $0.82) and $115.82 (115 strike + $0.82). But with the stock currently trading for $124.45, we have to be a little concerned that the stock is closing at $125 or higher on expiration, especially with 25 days remaining. If it closed at $125, we would lose all of our $0.82 investment.

The downside to this trade is that the $0.82 debit can go out worthless. To get back the $0.82, we can sell an OTM put spread. Common sense would tell us that we want to sell a put spread as far OTM as possible, but we know that as the spread goes further OTM we collect less premium. Therefore, we can sell the 115-110 put spread (sell the 115, buy the 110) to bring in $0.47, or we can sell the 120-115 put spread to bring in $0.90. The 120-115 put spread yields a credit of $0.90, offsetting the $0.82 for the traditional butterfly.

We get a new position by combining the traditional butterfly with selling the 120-115 put spread. We have now entered into an unbalanced butterfly, or 1-3-2 trade: long  one 125 put, short three 120 puts and long two 115 puts.

The $0.82 debit from the butterfly combined with the $0.90 credit from the put spread sale nets out to be an 8¢ credit, so even if the stock climbs outside our profit range, we will still keep the 8¢ credit.

The spread sale will increase our risk exposure on a break-even basis, but will decrease our risk exposure on a cost basis. “Building a better flytrap” compares the risk graph of the traditional butterfly and the newly formed 1-3-2 trade illustrating the power of this trade. As long as the stock does not fall below our downside break-even point, which is very close to the traditional butterfly’s break-even area, the 1-3-2 trade is superior.

Chart

Most professional options traders prefer the BWB to the 1-3-2 until the BWB entails a debit. Then, they would switch to the 1-3-2. The 1-3-2 can be an excellent trade to implement when volatility is too low or time until expiration is too short to do the broken-wing butterfly without an initial cost.

Alex Mendoza is the chief options strategist with Random Walk, which has produced numerous articles, books and CDs on options trading, including a book on broken-wing butterfly spreads. Visit their Web site:  RandomWalkTrading.com.


Comment on This Article

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 12/20/2010 3:25:32 AM
    • Mike Cunningham
    • BWB
    • Excellent article. The 1-3-2 position could be very helpful to someone who usually is wrong on direction.
    • 8/30/2011 9:45:46 AM
    • Charanjit Jootla
    • Regular income using BWBs and 1-3-2 strategy
    • Good article Alex. I have a question. JL Lord's book talks about the BWB strategy being capable of generating an income. My question is - how does this strategy generate an income if all the options expire worthless apart from retaining the credit collected? Typically, what rate of return on the amount margined can one expect if all options expire worthless. Thanks.
    • 12/24/2011 4:44:35 PM
    • Eric Grosser
    • Problem with 1 3 2 butterfly
    • One of the problems with this spread is that very soon after reaching your maximum profit at $120, it's not long before you reach your maximum loss. I prefer a 1 2 1 2 (similar to a 1 3 2, two of the 3 at the $120 strike, 1 at the $115 and long the $110.) This gives more room after reaching my greatest profit, and a wider profit range.

Recent Issues


Archived Issues

Most Read Articles

Related Articles