Quantcast
RSS Feeds | Advertise | Subscribe | Contact Us
Futures Magazine.

News

Web Exclusives

 Rule change for CPOs could be coming 

 
Print This Article
Return To Article
Normal Text
Large Text

The National Futures Association (NFA) has petitioned the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to amend Regulation 4.5, which provides an exclusion from the definition of “commodity pool operator” (CPO) for certain qualifying entities, namely registered investment companies.

The rule change, if enacted by the CFTC, would go back to the more limited exclusion prior to 2003, which freed certain regulated entities from CPO registration if all their futures and options positions were used solely for bona fide hedging or if those positions only represented 5% of the fund’s liquidating value.

Basically the exclusion allowed commodity pool type products to register as mutual funds and face much less restrictive and complex regulation. NFA Senior VP Thomas Sexton says, “If you are a public commodity pool, you are regulated by NFA, Finra, the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commision) and the CFTC. These registered investment companies are only regulated by the SEC.”

The NFA cites several examples in their petition and Sexton says several funds are taking advantage of this. “You have funds offering investment in a retail futures product for as little as a $1,000 investment and traditionally the agencies responsible for overseeing those products, the CFTC and NFA, have no jurisdiction over those particular funds.”

Sexton adds, “The reason to change the rule is to ensure that retail participants are getting the required disclosure that they should be getting and that these funds are regulated by those that have the expertise to regulate the funds.”

Hot New CTAs

Futures is once again looking for the best new commodity trading advisors to profile in our annual feature, “Hot New CTAs.” If you will have managed customer funds for at least one year as of the end of August and have less than $25 million under management, e-mail your disclosure document and audited track record to dcollins@futuresmag.com, or send it to Futures Magazine, 222 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 620, Chicago, IL 60606, Attn. Dan Collins. Deadline:  Friday, Aug. 20.


Comment on This Article

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 7/26/2010 4:14:00 PM
    • Socrates
    • Only Regulated by the SEC
    • The quote by Mr. Sexton is a touch misleading. A public commodity pool is regulated by the NFA, Finra, the SEC (under the 33 and 34 Act) and the CFTC. The registered invesment companies he talks about are regulated by the SEC (under the 33, 34 and 40 Acts), Finra, and the IRS. Notably, the 1940 Act is the most regulatory complex of all the Securities Laws. Further, the investment companies relying on current Regulation 4.5 are already subject to special exams by the CFTC to demonstrate their compliance with 4.5. While the NFA and CFTC are arguably the entities with the expertise to regulate commodity futures, I am less than convinced that the CFTC and NFA have any additional expertise in regulating pooled investment vehicles that may hold commodity futures. Mutual Funds are a better investment vehicle than traditional commodity pools, in large part because of how they are regulated. This proposal seems to be pure protectionism, protecting the issuers of an inferior product, and protecting the jurisdiction of a regulator.

Recent Issues


Archived Issues

Most Read Articles

Related Articles