The last time a politician named Trudeau tried to regulate Canada’s energy industry, it sparked outrage in Alberta. Justin Trudeau is betting his plan to manage growth in the oil sands will be less combustible.
The Liberal Party leader and son of former prime minister Pierre Trudeau is pushing more stringent controls on greenhouse-gas emissions in the country’s oil-and-gas sector and a more conciliatory tone on pipelines. He hopes this will help his party regain credibility in a province where they haven’t held a seat since ceding power to Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservatives in 2006.
He’s even backing the idea put forward by the provinces of a national energy strategy, despite lingering anger in oil-rich Alberta to the National Energy Program his father introduced in 1980, which increased taxes on crude (NYMEX:CLN14) producers to offset the impact of high energy prices in eastern Canada.
“We’re a very different country than we were 30 years ago,” Trudeau said in an interview last week in Fort McMurray, Alberta, home base for Canada’s oil-sands industry. “People want to know that their prime minister is going to say the same thing in downtown Toronto as he will in Fort McMurray.”
Trudeau’s energy stance will be tested today in special elections to fill vacancies in four districts: the Alberta constituencies of Fort McMurray-Athabasca and Macleod, as well as the Toronto-area seats of Trinity-Spadina and Scarborough- Agincourt. Canada’s elections agency will start publishing results after 9:30 p.m. Toronto time, when polls close. The votes are also a chance to test campaign themes ahead of the next general election, scheduled for October 2015.
Harper’s ruling Conservatives have made it a national priority to expand infrastructure to transport output from the oil sands, which accounts for most of Canada’s recoverable crude reserves, the world’s third largest. Heavy crude from the oil sands has traded at an average of $18.72 per barrel below the U.S. benchmark over the last five years due to a transportation bottleneck in North America. The discount costs Canada’s economy as much as C$50 million per day, according to the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.
Trudeau’s position on pipelines put his party between the Conservatives and the largest opposition bloc, the New Democratic Party. While Trudeau and Harper both support TransCanada Corp.’s proposed Keystone XL pipeline to the U.S., the Liberal leader opposes Enbridge Inc.’s C$6.5 billion ($6.1 billion) Northern Gateway project to carry diluted bitumen to the Pacific coast.
The NDP, led by Tom Mulcair, opposes most new pipelines, with the exception of TransCanada’s Energy East proposal to an Irving Oil refinery in New Brunswick. Mulcair has said the country should refine more of its own crude.
A national energy strategy supported by the country’s provinces would help pipeline companies secure the “social license” to break ground, Trudeau said. Liberals would also establish a price for carbon emissions in the oil and gas sector, a move he says would help curb emissions and give political “cover” to President Barack Obama to approve Keystone XL.
Under former leader Michael Ignatieff, the Liberals were reduced to 34 seats in the nation’s 308-seat legislature in the 2011 election, the worst showing in the party’s history. That relegated them to third place in party standings behind Harper’s Conservatives and the NDP. It also left them hobbled in the country’s western provinces and territories.
The Liberals also lost the 2008 election after then leader Stephane Dion proposed a carbon tax that was vilified by the Conservatives.
Copyright 2014 Bloomberg. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.