The CFTC imposes a $300,000 civil monetary penalty and a cease and desist order on Velocity for these violations.
SEC sanctions portfolio manager for forging documents, concealing personal trades
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sanctioned a former portfolio manager at a Boulder, Colo.-based investment adviser for forging documents and misleading the firm’s chief compliance officer to conceal his failure to report personal trades.
An SEC investigation found that Carl Johns of Louisville, Colo., failed to pre-clear or report several hundred securities trades in his personal accounts as required under the federal securities laws and the code of ethics at Boulder Investment Advisers (BIA). Johns concealed the trades in quarterly and annual trading reports that he submitted to BIA by altering brokerage statements and other documents that he attached to those reports. Johns later tried to conceal his misconduct by creating false documents that purported to be pre-trade approvals, and misled the firm’s chief compliance officer in her investigation into his improper trading.
To settle the SEC’s charges – which are the agency’s first under Rule 38a-1(c) of the Investment Company Act for misleading and obstructing a chief compliance officer (CCO) – Johns agreed to pay more than $350,000 and be barred from the securities industry for at least five years.
“Securities industry professionals have an obligation to adhere to compliance policies, and they certainly must not interfere with the chief compliance officers who enforce those policies,” said Julie Lutz, Acting Co-Director of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. “Johns set out to cover up his compliance failures by creating false documents and misleading his firm’s CCO.”
According to the SEC’s order instituting settled administrative proceedings against Johns, the Investment Company Act required him to submit quarterly reports of his personal securities transactions and annual reports of his securities holdings. His firm’s code of ethics contained further restrictions on when and how Johns could trade in securities, and required his transactions to be pre-cleared by the firm’s chief compliance officer. From 2006 to 2010, Johns failed to comply with these obligations and did not pre-clear or report approximately 640 trades. These included at least 91 trades involving securities held or acquired by the funds managed by the firm. The code of ethics restricted trading in securities that the funds were buying or selling.
According to the SEC, Johns submitted inaccurate quarterly and annual reports and falsely certified his annual compliance with the code of ethics. Johns physically altered brokerage statements, trade confirmations, and pre-clearance approvals before submitting them to the firm along with these reports. For example, he manually deleted securities holdings listed on his brokerage statements before submitting them in order to avoid disclosing securities purchases that were not pre-cleared.
The SEC also found that Johns created several documents that purported to be pre-clearance requests approved by the firm’s CCO, who had never actually reviewed or approved such trades. Johns created these false pre-clearance approvals to cover up instances in his annual report when securities transactions were not pre-cleared. Johns also altered the trade confirmations that he submitted to BIA by backdating the dates of the transactions, and he backdated trade confirmations to make it falsely appear as though pre-clearances were granted in advance of the transactions.
According to the SEC’s order, the firm’s CCO in late 2010 identified irregularities in the documents that Johns submitted to BIA detailing his personal securities transactions. The irregularities prompted the CCO to make inquiries about his compliance with the firm’s code of ethics, and Johns misled the CCO in response. Johns falsely told the CCO that he had closed certain brokerage accounts when in fact they remained open and were involved in trading that was not pre-cleared as required. Johns also accessed the hard copy file of his previously submitted brokerage statements and physically altered them to create the false impression that his trading was in compliance.
In settling the SEC’s charges, Johns has agreed to pay disgorgement of $231,169, prejudgment interest of $23,889, and a penalty of $100,000. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, Johns consented to a five-year bar and a cease-and-desist order.
SEC charges Indiana resident with conducting Ponzi scheme targeting retirement savings
The SEC alleges that John K. Marcum touted himself as a successful trader and asset manager to raise more than $6 million through promissory notes issued by his company Guaranty Reserves Trust. Marcum helped investors set up self-directed IRA accounts and gained control over their retirement assets, saying he would earn them strong returns on the promissory notes by day-trading in stocks while guaranteeing the safety of their principal investment. Yet Marcum did little actual trading and almost always lost money when he did. Throughout his scheme, Marcum provided investors with false account statements showing annual returns of more than 20%. Meanwhile, he used investor funds to pay for his luxurious personal lifestyle and finance several start-up companies.
The SEC obtained an emergency court order to freeze the assets of Marcum and his company.
“Marcum tricked investors into putting their retirement nest eggs in his hands by portraying himself as a talented trader who could earn high returns while eliminating the risk of loss,” said Timothy L. Warren, acting director of the SEC’s Chicago regional office. “Marcum tried to carry on his charade of success even after he squandered nearly all of the funds from investors.”
According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Indianapolis, Marcum began his scheme in 2010. Investors gave Marcum control of their assets by either rolling their existing IRA accounts into the newly-established self-directed IRA accounts or by transferring their taxable assets directly to brokerage accounts that Marcum controlled. Marcum and certain investors co-signed the promissory notes, and Marcum then placed them in the IRA accounts.
The SEC alleges that Marcum assured investors he could safely grow their money through investments in widely-held publicly-traded stocks, and he promised annual returns between 10% and 20%. Marcum also told a number of investors that their principal was “guaranteed” and would never be at risk. He falsely told at least one investor that her principal would be federally insured. In the little trading he has done, Marcum has suffered losses amounting to more than $900,000. He has misappropriated the remaining investor funds for various unauthorized uses.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Marcum used investor money as collateral for a $3 million line of credit at the brokerage firm where he used to work. He took frequent and regular advances from the line of credit to fund such start-up ventures as a bridal store, a bounty hunter reality television show, and a soul food restaurant owned and operated by the bounty hunters. None of these businesses appear to be profitable, and Marcum’s investors were not aware that their money was being used for these purposes. Marcum used nearly $1.4 million of investor money to make payments directly to the start-up ventures and other companies. He also used more than $500,000 to pay personal expenses accrued on credit card bills, including airline tickets, luxury car payments, hotel stays, sports and event tickets, and tabs at a Hollywood nightclub.
According to the SEC, Marcum did not have the funds needed to honor investor redemption requests, so he provided certain investors with a “recovery plan” that revealed his intention to solicit funds from new investors so that he could pay back his existing investors. Marcum had a phone conversation with three investors in June 2013 and admitted that he had misappropriated investor funds and was unable to pay investors back. During this call, Marcum begged the investors for more time to recover their money. He offered to name them as beneficiaries on his life insurance policies, which he claimed include a “suicide clause” imposing a two-year waiting period for benefits. He suggested that if he is unsuccessful in returning their money, he would commit suicide to guarantee that they would eventually be repaid.
The SEC’s complaint alleges that Marcum and Guaranty Reserves Trust violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The SEC sought and obtained emergency relief including a temporary restraining order and asset freeze. The SEC additionally seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and financial penalties from Marcum and Guaranty Reserves Trust, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains from Marcum Companies LLC, which is named as a relief defendant.
For previous Blotters.