"All the major indexes rallied to new highs and their best levels since March 2009 last week. Time for hats and horns, right?"
If you’re feeling festive, go for it.
"But there was overwhelming confirmation of the move by market indicators, wasn’t there?"
Nope.
"But higher prices are a good thing aren’t they?"
Yes, if they stay that way.
"So what’s the problem?"
Strength was not confirmed by Short-term Momentum, Cumulative Volume, the Call/Put $Value Flow Line (CPFL), or the Most Actives Advance/Decline Line (MAAD) not to mention upside indicator failures on the Intermediate and Major Cycles.
"Oops… Well, then what caused prices to go up? The Royal Wedding was a success?"
There were more buyers than sellers.
"Oh…."
In relative defiance of market internals, stock market prices continued higher last week with the S&P 500 Index gaining 1.9%, the Dow Jones Industrial Average 2.4%, the NASDAQ Composite 1.8%, and the Value Line Index 1.9%. Unfortunately, despite the party most of our Short-term indicators failed to show up. And the market is "Overbought" on that smallest cycle yet again. At the same time, Intermediate Cycle Momentum continues to exhibit an upside failure after peaking back at the mid-February index highs. So now the question is will the market continue higher unabated, or will those negative market internals soon begin to exert some downward pressure on prices?
First, we suspect that the rally that began after the mid-March lows could prove to be an A-B-C rally that could allow for index prices to appreciate another few percentage points to complete the "C" leg of the move. Upside targets to 1385—S&P, 12990—Dow 30, 2920—NASDAQ, and 3235—Value Line are possible. Given the fact market internals have confirmed virtually NONE of the this possible "C" leg rally, recent strength would be consistent with not only a Short-term high, but also with the end of the Intermediate-term rally that began last July.
Also, the fact that both CPFL and MAAD on the Minor Cycle have stubbornly refused to make new highs with the market is a negative divergence and is the first significant negative divergence by those indicators since the October 2007 highs. But there is also a marked disparity between Daily MAAD data and the Weekly MAAD series which rallied to new highs last week. While we prefer Daily data to Weekly stats because of the sensitivity of the shorter cycle, the longer-term MAAD cycle cannot be ignored. Also, it wouldn’t take much upside impetus in Daily or Weekly CPFL data to create new highs to underscore recent market strength.
Click chart to enlarge
There is also the lingering problem with Cumulative Volume (see accompanying chart) that has not only failed to make new highs with index prices since April 2010, but the indicator has also failed to make new highs into what we are calling the "C" leg of the rally that began nearly two months ago. Clearly the underpinnings of this upmove have continued to deteriorate. Question is when will the pedal of the indicators hit the metal of pricing?
As we suggested last week, for accounts which have been long the lion’s share of this market, exit strategies are somewhat easier. Strength can be faded using the Minor and Intermediate Cycle Price Channels (see table). It is the uncommitted money that faces a dilemma, however. Should an investor chase a mature rally, or simply wait for corrective action to develop?
Because we have always tended to view the stock market as a "cash cow" rather than as a conduit to the "ownership" of companies, patience has proven to be a virtue since opportunities have had a tendency to reappear over and over again. Nonetheless, for liquid investors we are inclined toward more defensive strategies, given the fact this rally is mature. One choice might be written call options that could allow an investor to take advantage of a market that has developed Momentum problems. Premium erosion could ultimately prevail and could produce profits even though prices might move marginally higher. If prices simply decline sooner than later, so much the better for the written call.
While we must admit that we have not liked the "feel" of this market for months, it’s true that higher prices have overcome negative thinking and the "Wall of Worry" by rallying lockstep to new highs. That is why we have erred on the side of positive possibilities while also suggesting protection against the downside. But, come to think of it, protecting against the downside is always a good idea.
| Index |
Daily stops | Weekly | Monthly | ||||||
| 5/2 | 5/3 | 5/4 | 5/5 | 5/6 | 5/6 | 5/31 | |||
|
S&P |
Last |
%Chg |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
|
Dow 30 |
Last |
%Chg |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
|
NASDAQ |
Last |
%Chg |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
|
Val. Line |
Last |
%Chg |
SELL |
SELL 3030.58 |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
SELL |
Note: Stop levels, a function of the extant trend, are based on the trailing moving average price channels for the Highs or the Lows of an index. Whether or not a specific index is suggesting a "Buy" or Sell" is determined by whether or not index prices are above or below the current channel Stop levels. Stop levels should only be used as an entry or exit guide and in conjunction with other market entry and exit strategies.
McCurtain Most Actives Advance/Decline Line (MAAD)
A marked divergence currently exists between Daily and Weekly data in our MAAD indicator. While the Weekly series rallied to a new high and its best levels last week and since the March 2009 market lows, Daily data remains back at levels not seen since early January.
While we tend to prefer the more sensitive smaller cycle series, the fact that Weekly MAAD has demonstrated strength by re-asserting its longer-term uptrend is cause to wonder at the failure of the shorter-term data. While several positive sessions in Daily MAAD statistics would be enough to create new highs for the indicator and to confirm recent short-term index strength, we suspect that the recent Daily MAAD failure relative to new highs in index prices could be preliminary to a negative change in the overall market. If so, positive strength in Weekly MAAD data could prove to be an anomaly.
Nonetheless, with the upside failure of Daily MAAD data, there is a suggestion Smart Money continues to have reservations about this market.
Click charts to enlarge
McCurtain Call/Put Dollar Value Flow Line (CPFL)
While CPFL perked a bit higher last week, the bellwether indicator continues to hold below plot highs made back on February 25 and despite strength by the major indexes that have exceeded the February index price highs. While it’s true that CPFL has been confined to a very narrow range for the past two months and could punch out to a new plot high with relative ease, the fact that it has not confirmed recent strength is a cause for worry from a bullish point of view. That upside failure is an indication options players have been buying enough puts on a dollar value basis to offset call buying by other options players.
While it’s always true that the net of Call $Volume vs. Put $Volume can be the result of a variety of hedging strategies, from a historical perspective we believe that a negative divergence by CPFL in a bull trend is not a good thing for the sustenance of a rally.
Click charts to enlarge
Conclusion
Market index prices rallied to new highs and their best levels last week relative to the March 2009 highs. But the majority of our market indicators did not confirm that movement. The lone exception was Weekly MAAD which bettered its mid-February plot highs by a small margin.
While there is nothing like higher prices to negate the implications of negative market internals, we have come to learn that prescient and unfavorable indicators are eventually resolved via lower market prices. Clearly we would like to see higher prices accompanied by positive market internals. It is when negative market divergences develop that caution is warranted. This remains one of those times.
MAAD data for past 30 Weeks* CPFL data for past 30 Weeks
|
Date |
NYSE Adv |
NYSE Dec |
Date |
OEX Call $Volume |
OEX Put $Volume | |
|
10-8-10 |
14 |
6 |
10-8-10 |
394156 |
98483 | |
|
10-15-10 |
10 |
10 |
10-15-10 |
476975 |
115923 | |
|
10-22-10 |
11 |
9 |
10-22-10 |
2575024 |
116468 | |
|
10-29-10 |
10 |
10 |
10-29-10 |
376133 |
120924 | |
|
11-5-10 |
13 |
7 |
11-5-10 |
547056 |
71345 | |
|
11-12-10 |
5 |
15 |
11-12-10 |
203906 |
305387 | |
|
11-19-10 |
7 |
13 |
11-19-10 |
241420 |
143672 | |
|
11-26-10 |
5 |
15 |
11-26-10 |
116916 |
149196 | |
|
12-3-10 |
16 |
4 |
12-3-10 |
701973 |
55878 | |
|
12-10-10 |
15 |
5 |
12-10-10 |
395991 |
42814 | |
|
12-17-10 |
9 |
11 |
12-17-10 |
441634 |
61008 | |
|
12-24-10 |
17 |
3 |
12-24-10 |
177600 |
88159 | |
|
12-31-10 |
16 |
4 |
12-31-10 |
154527 |
60647 | |
|
1-7-11 |
16 |
4 |
1-7-11 |
458733 |
97512 | |
|
1-14-11 |
12 |
7 |
1-14-11 |
327777 |
49317 | |
|
1-21-11 |
5 |
15 |
1-21-11 |
376104 |
106618 | |
|
1-28-11 |
6 |
14 |
1-28-11 |
227154 |
249821 | |
|
2-4-11 |
17 |
3 |
2-4-11 |
590448 |
67646 | |
|
2-11-11 |
13 |
7 |
2-11-11 |
514220 |
98361 | |
|
2-18-11 |
12 |
8 |
2-18-11 |
2557718 |
102605 | |
|
2-25-11 |
5 |
15 |
2-25-11 |
893080 |
195746 | |
|
3-4-11 |
8 |
12 |
3-4-11 |
170888 |
225359 | |
|
3-11-11 |
10 |
10 |
3-11-11 |
149920 |
275062 | |
|
3-18-11 |
5 |
15 |
3-18-11 |
280218 |
482751 | |
|
3-25-11 |
13 |
7 |
3-25-11 |
202631 |
142789 | |
|
4-1-11 |
16 |
4 |
4-1-11 |
209146 |
104628 | |
|
4-8-11 |
13 |
7 |
4-8-11 |
224555 |
149398 | |
|
4-15-11 |
6 |
14 |
4-15-11 |
86953 |
215520 | |
|
4-22-11 |
12 |
7 |
4-22-11 |
144453 |
106144 | |
|
4-29-11 |
17 |
3 |
4-29-11 |
273582 |
89492 |
*Note: All data is for calendar week ending on Friday even though ending date may be a holiday.
Unchanged issues in MAAD calculations are not counted.
MAAD data for past 30 days** CPFL data for past 30 Days
|
Date |
NYSE Adv |
NYSE Dec |
Date |
OEX Call $Volume |
OEX Put $Volume |
|
3-18-11 |
13 |
7 |
3-18-11 |
52893 |
64412 |
|
3-21-11 |
10 |
10 |
3-21-11 |
28622 |
55081 |
|
3-22-11 |
4 |
16 |
3-22-11 |
35199 |
23573 |
|
3-23-11 |
11 |
9 |
3-23-11 |
29479 |
67825 |
|
3-24-11 |
13 |
7 |
3-24-11 |
54166 |
30110 |
|
3-25-11 |
13 |
7 |
3-25-11 |
63815 |
50668 |
|
3-28-11 |
11 |
8 |
3-28-11 |
46232 |
26249 |
|
3-29-11 |
8 |
12 |
3-29-11 |
76894 |
22596 |
|
3-30-11 |
12 |
7 |
3-30-11 |
40045 |
47020 |
|
3-31-11 |
6 |
14 |
3-31-11 |
26567 |
22852 |
|
4-1-11 |
17 |
3 |
4-1-11 |
38507 |
41917 |
|
4-4-11 |
12 |
7 |
4-4-11 |
113235 |
28645 |
|
4-5-11 |
15 |
5 |
4-5-11 |
36928 |
27998 |
|
4-6-11 |
12 |
7 |
4-6-11 |
34609 |
26073 |
|
4-7-11 |
7 |
13 |
4-7-11 |
74493 |
41670 |
|
4-8-11 |
5 |
15 |
4-8-11 |
16121 |
41602 |
|
4-11-11 |
7 |
13 |
4-11-11 |
12804 |
43934 |
|
4-12-11 |
10 |
9 |
4-12-11 |
33875 |
123115 |
|
4-13-11 |
7 |
12 |
4-13-11 |
25130 |
65267 |
|
4-14-11 |
10 |
9 |
4-14-11 |
26774 |
67615 |
|
4-15-11 |
10 |
10 |
4-15-11 |
33183 |
30100 |
|
4-18-11 |
3 |
16 |
4-18-11 |
23208 |
100944 |
|
4-19-11 |
11 |
8 |
4-19-11 |
15252 |
17481 |
|
4-20-11 |
13 |
7 |
4-20-11 |
51113 |
34874 |
|
4-21-11 |
13 |
7 |
4-21-11 |
32118 |
40390 |
|
4-25-11 |
9 |
11 |
4-25-11 |
24351 |
13842 |
|
4-26-11 |
15 |
5 |
4-26-11 |
43515 |
29867 |
|
4-27-11 |
13 |
6 |
4-27-11 |
78341 |
20570 |
|
4-28-11 |
10 |
9 |
4-28-11 |
35967 |
37560 |
|
4-29-11 |
10 |
9 |
4-29-11 |
55003 |
37797 |
**Note: Unchanged issues are not counted.
Robert McCurtain is a technical analyst, market timer and private investor based in New York City. He is a member of the Market Technicians Association and can be reached at traderbob@nyc.rr.com. If you would like to read more about how the CPFL is constructed, read a Futures article on the concept. This will take you to the MAAD article.




